Hive  /  Construction
For general contractors, homebuilders, subs, and material suppliers

Construction runs on a 94-day cycle. We replace the cycle with a signed receipt.

The U.S. construction industry moves $2.14 trillion a year through workflows that are decades behind every other sector. Subs wait an average of 74 days to get paid. Two thirds of payments are still paper checks. Hive ships a signed-receipt layer that lets a milestone, a delivery, a retainage release, or a lien waiver settle the moment the work is verified.

Procore-compatible Salesforce native 50-state prompt-pay safe UCC Article 2 receipt DOL-inspectable audit trail
Install in 5 Minutes See 5 use cases Pilot a project
$2.14T
Annual US spend
94 days
Average DSO
69%
Still paper checks
$299B
Cost of slow payments

01Five places this hits today

Five different cross-org handoffs. Same missing layer. Pick the one closest to your project ledger.

ASubcontractor milestone — paid on attestation

A subcontractor frames the wall. The inspector signs off. Today the sub waits 74 days for the payment to clear the GC's three-stage approval and the lender's draw inspection. Materials were paid out of pocket on day minus seven. The sub is the bank.

Hive ships a signed receipt the moment the inspector attests the milestone. A nano-payment lands in the sub's wallet inside the same transaction. The traditional Net-30 invoice still runs in parallel for the balance — this is a cash-flow accelerator, not a replacement.

What gets signed

Inspector signoff binds to a sub-wallet payout. Both sides hold the receipt.

Settles in: Seconds Typical amount: $500 — $5,000 Rail: Nano
  • Action typeconstruction.subcontractor.milestone.paid
  • Receipt binds — subcontractor_did, milestone_id, gc_did, inspector_signoff_hash, amount_micro, lien_waiver_hash
  • Compliance shape — 50-state prompt payment act, with the receipt as proof-of-payment date
  • Why subs say yes — solves their number-one pain. 73% currently self-finance materials.
  • Why GCs say yes — sub retention is a measurable line item. Reduces turnover cost.
Closest live use case shape: order-line-shipped →

BPer-load material delivery — settles on scan

A lumber truck pulls onto the site. The yard checker scans the delivery ticket. Today the supplier waits 60 days for a $200 load because the GC is on Net-60 with their lender. Multiply by 256 million deliveries a year and the supplier is also the bank.

Hive turns the scan into a signed receipt and a per-load nano-payment in one transaction. No new behavior — the delivery is already being scanned and verified. The supplier moves from credit risk to point-of-sale economics. The GC captures the 2-5% early-pay discount.

What gets signed

Delivery ticket binds to a supplier-wallet payout at the moment of scan.

Settles in: Seconds Typical amount: $75 — $500 Rail: Nano
  • Action typeconstruction.material.delivery.paid
  • Receipt binds — supplier_did, material_type, quantity, delivery_ticket_hash, inspector_verification, amount_micro
  • Compliance shape — UCC Article 2 record-of-sale, with the receipt body serving the Statute of Frauds shape
  • Why suppliers say yes — payment on delivery, not on invoice. Zero credit risk.
  • Why GCs say yes — the early-pay discount is real money the supplier was already willing to give up.
Closest live use case shape: order-line-shipped →

CRetainage release — weekly micro-increments

Over $100 billion sits in retainage at any given moment, held in escrow for 30 to 180 days after project completion. It is the sub's money. The GC earns nothing by holding it. The state statute says when it has to come out. The bookkeeping is the only reason it does not come out faster.

Hive turns each weekly attestation into a fractional retainage release. The receipt encodes the milestone, the lien waiver, and the release percentage. The state's retainage cap is enforced in the contract. Subs get a predictable trickle instead of a 90-day cliff.

What gets signed

Each release is a receipt with the state-compliance check inside the trigger.

Cadence: Weekly Increment: Typically 2.5% Rail: Nano or Standard
  • Action typeconstruction.retainage.released
  • Receipt binds — project_id, subcontractor_did, release_percentage, inspection_pass_hash, lien_waiver_hash, amount_micro
  • Compliance shape — 50-state retainage cap, with state_code embedded in the action_ref
  • Why GCs say yes — the dead-money objection vanishes. Audit shape is cleaner than escrow accounts.
  • Why subs say yes — predictable weekly cash flow instead of waiting for a punch list to close.
Closest live use case shape: wire-attest →

DLien waiver — payment and waiver in one atomic transaction

The lien waiver standoff is the textbook example. The sub will not sign the waiver until they are paid. The GC will not pay until the waiver is signed. Subs withhold, GCs hold back, the project blocks, and 4.4 million mechanic's liens get filed every year because of the gap.

Hive resolves the standoff with atomic execution. The waiver signature and the payment land in the same on-chain transaction. If either side fails, both revert. Textura digitized the workflow; the settlement is still 3-5 days on ACH. We finish what they started.

What gets signed

Waiver and payment are bound to the same action_ref. No standoff possible.

Settles in: One transaction Failure mode: Both sides revert Rail: Nano
  • Action typeconstruction.lien_waiver.atomic_settled
  • Receipt binds — gc_did, subcontractor_did, project_id, waiver_type (partial/final), waiver_hash, payment_amount_micro, notary_attestation
  • Compliance shape — 50-state mechanic's lien statute. Notary block included when state requires.
  • Why GCs say yes — the standoff that costs them weeks per project disappears.
  • Why subs say yes — signing the waiver is no longer an act of faith.
Closest live use case shape: claim-deny with counter-attestation →

EEarned wage — worker paid per completed task

Construction has 8.3 million workers. Most are paid weekly or bi-weekly, but their expenses — gas, tools, meals — are daily. The earned-wage-access market is large and growing, and existing players do not specialize in construction's piece-rate, per-task, per-mile compensation.

Hive issues a per-task receipt the moment a supervisor attests completion. A fraction of the worker's accrued wages settles to their wallet inside the same transaction. Payroll cycle continues unchanged for the balance. DOL gets an immutable per-task audit trail.

What gets signed

Task completion plus supervisor attestation triggers an earned-wage payout.

Settles in: Seconds Typical amount: $50 — $200 Rail: Nano
  • Action typeconstruction.worker.earned_wage.accessed
  • Receipt binds — worker_did, employer_did, task_completed, hours_worked (or piece_count), supervisor_attestation, amount_micro, payroll_period_id
  • Compliance shape — FLSA, state wage laws, Davis-Bacon-compatible audit trail
  • Why workers say yes — gas, food, tools paid for today on work done today.
  • Why GCs say yes — recruiting and retention pull at no cost to payroll cycle.
Closest live use case shape: inline-pay →

02Why now

Procore digitized the project plan. Oracle Textura digitized the lien-waiver workflow. Built Technologies digitized the lender draw. None of them touched settlement speed. Payments still clear on three-to-five-day ACH or, worse, paper. The workflow is online; the money is still in the mail.

Hive does not compete with any of them. We sit underneath. We sign the handoff, we settle the value, and we leave the workflow layer to whoever the GC already pays for.

03What goes on the record

All nine live use cases, with Apex, Flow XML, signed-receipt JSON, and a curl proof per case →

Pilot a project. One job site. Two months.

We are ready to run a single-site pilot with a regional homebuilder, a Procore-connected GC, or a regional material supplier. Five minutes to install. One job to prove it. Two months to a measurable retention number on subs, suppliers, or workers.