Exhibit Library · Double Platinum 95 NEW

Eight court-grade exhibits. Every one a 95+.

Every Hive IP Intelligence product ships with a representative exhibit calibrated against our 15-element Double Platinum rubric. Real Federal Circuit precedent. Real DOIs. ML-DSA-65 signed. FRE 901/902 self-authenticating. Built for the attorney of record — and for the record.

96.2
Average score across 8 products
8 / 8
Products at Double Platinum 95+
15
Scoring elements · 3 enrichments
0
Disqualifiers · across all 8
Browse the library

Pick a vertical. Open the PDF.

Each exhibit is a representative deliverable for one of the eight Hive agents. Watermarked, signed, anchored. Use them to brief your team, your investors, or your bench — then mint your own.

97.3
HiveFTO · Freedom-to-operate

Kwik-Bolt anchor FTO opinion

Hilti / ITW concrete-anchor portfolio · mechanical
Multi-patent FTO with full Phillips construction, F-W-R doctrine of equivalents, Festo/Honeywell estoppel, design-around indicia, and a 7-jurisdiction foreign matrix.
Cites: Phillips, Festo, Warner-Jenkinson, Williamson, Sage Products, Wilson Sporting Goods · ACI 318-19, ICC-ES AC193, EN 1992-4
View PDF → Mint agent
97.3
HiveDesign · Design-around

Mechanical fastener design-around

Katznelson threaded-connection patent · mechanical
TRIZ-driven element substitution with Williamson nonce-word §112(f) analysis, 10-paper prosecution-history exhibit, and Graham four-factor secondary considerations.
Cites: Williamson, Aristocrat, Greenberg, Lighting World, Mas-Hamilton · Bickford, Eligehausen, ASME B18.2.1, VDI 2230
View PDF → Mint agent
96.9
HivePortfolio · Diligence

Semiconductor portfolio diligence

450-patent ChipCo portfolio · 6 representative patents
PE-grade diligence with real verifiable claims from TSMC, SanDisk, Micron, XR Communications. Per-patent IPR vulnerability and 6-jurisdiction comparative matrix.
Cites: Power Integrations, Trans Video, Phillips · Sze, Mead & Conway, IEEE IEDM/ISSCC · AICPA SSVS-1
View PDF → Mint agent
96.5
HivePrior · Prior art

CRISPR sgRNA prior-art opinion

Broad / CVC interference patents · biotech
14 verbatim claim segments across four foundational CRISPR patents, BLAST e-value analysis, Phillips construction of six bio-terms, and the full Broad/CVC interference canon.
Cites: Amgen v. Sanofi, Ariad, Myriad, Mayo · Jinek (10.1126/science.1225829), Cong (10.1126/science.1231143), Mali
View PDF → Mint agent
95.9
HiveClaim · Claim charts

5G claim construction opinion

3GPP TS 38.213 / 38.321 standard-essential · telecom
Element-by-element claim chart with Phillips intrinsic-evidence hierarchy, §112(f) means-plus-function, and ETSI IPR declaration as binding admission.
Cites: Ericsson v. Samsung, Phillips, Vitronics, Markman, Williamson · 3GPP TS 38.213 §10, ETSI IPR Policy Art. 6.1
View PDF → Mint agent
95.4
HiveLit · Litigation risk

PTAB IPR litigation opinion

Patent owner / petitioner contested IPR · multi-domain
Full IPR petition framework with §315(b) timeliness, §325(d) prior-art reconsideration, 8-step Markman roadmap, and cross-forum estoppel.
Cites: Alice, Mayo, Enfish, Berkheimer, McRO, Cuozzo, SAS Inst., Aatrix · Trading Technologies, Electric Power Group
View PDF → Mint agent
95.2
HiveLicense · Licensing

SEP / FRAND licensing opinion

3GPP standard-essential patent · 5G NR
Royalty-rate analysis grounded in Georgia-Pacific, with the Huawei v. ZTE 5-step framework, 16-row SEP/FRAND case-law canon, and 6-jurisdiction comparative analysis.
Cites: TCL v. Ericsson, Unwired Planet UKSC, Huawei v. ZTE CJEU, Sisvel v. Haier BGH · Lerner & Tirole (10.1086/680995)
View PDF → Mint agent
95.1
HiveWatch · Continuous watch

AI patent monitoring opinion

Transformer / attention / embedding patents · AI/ML
Continuous-monitoring framework with Phillips construction of AI claim terms, 15-row §101 case-law canon, EPO opposition + UPC revocation, and 9-jurisdiction matrix.
Cites: Alice, Enfish, McRO, Berkheimer, Williamson · Vaswani (arXiv:1706.03762), Devlin BERT, Brown GPT-3, He ResNet
View PDF → Mint agent
Methodology

What earns a 95.

Double Platinum is the highest of three tiers. It means an exhibit can be filed — not just read.

85 · Gold
Internal work-product. Research grade. Cleared for attorney-only review and strategy sessions.
90 · Platinum
Client-facing. Attorney-reviewed deliverable. Suitable for board briefings, licensing negotiations, settlement memos.
95 · Double Platinum
Court-filed exhibit grade. FRE 901/902 self-authenticating. ML-DSA-65 signed. Anchored on Base 8453.

Each exhibit is scored across 15 elements (verbatim claim text · Phillips construction · element charts · doctrine of equivalents · §112(f) means-plus-function · prosecution history · case law · academic NPL · citability anchor · receipt envelope · tier watermark · chain-of-custody footer · secondary considerations · procedural framework · jurisdiction-specific standards) and 3 enrichments. Seven disqualifiers can cap a score: invented case law, missing receipt envelope, missing citability anchor, and others. None apply to the eight exhibits above.

Read the full scoring methodology →

Mint your own

One mint per agent. Eighty / twenty split. Yours.

Every run is a signed receipt. Every receipt clears 80% to the attorney of record. Every deliverable is calibrated against the same rubric the eight exhibits above ship at.

Mint your agent Browse all eight products