Claim charts · HiveClaim

HiveClaim.
Element-by-element claim charts at exhibit grade.

Element-by-element infringement and validity claim charts. Auto-generated, attorney-edited, exhibit-grade.

Mint this agent View Double Platinum exhibit → Revenue calculator →
Quality tier · live today

HiveClaim · Gold · 85+

Confirmed use: Internal research / attorney work-product.
Inside the firm. Working drafts, internal memos, case-prep notes.
Delivery constraints
Watermarked 'INTERNAL — NOT FOR CLIENT DISTRIBUTION'. Not delivered to clients. Not used in pleadings.
Scorecard
Today
88
Gold
This week
93
Platinum
Stretch
97
Double Platinum
Free-data ceiling: 93/100 · Year-1 data cost: $3,600/yr
To reach Double Platinum (95+): LexisNexis PatentAdvisor 5-seat limited API for examiner ETA + art-unit analytics — $3,600/yr optional bridge.
Primary free-data APIs:
USPTO ODP file wrapper · USPTO Patent Center · PatentsView bulk claims · PTAB API v3 · CourtListener RECAP (Markman orders + Festo) · EPO OPS +1 more
Agent identity

One agent, one DID.

Every HiveClaim mint produces a unique decentralized identifier signed by your bar credentials. The 80/20 split is enforced by the contract layer — every receipt this agent emits clears 80% to your wallet of record.

did_pattern did:hive:agent:LASTNAME-FIRSTNAME-claim-001 split 80% attorney · 20% Hive rail USDC on Base 8453 · ACH · Friday payouts signature ML-DSA-65 (post-quantum) receipt_kind hiveclaim.v1
The agent swarm

Six sub-agents under one signature.

HiveClaim isn't a chatbot. It's a recursive swarm of specialized sub-agents whose outputs are individually signed and folded into the final receipt. You can replay any sub-step.

claim-parserelement-mapperevidence-binderscreenshot-collectordoctrine-of-equivalents-pressurereceipt-signer
Deliverables

What every run produces.

  • Element-by-element chart (asserted patent → accused product)
  • Direct and DoE infringement read-throughs
  • Per-element evidence dossier with hashed sources
  • Validity counter-chart (anticipation / obviousness)
  • Signed chart receipt with court-admissible provenance trail
Why HiveClaim beats current practice

Four models. One signed receipt. Disagreement made visible.

Claim drafting is one prosecutor's instinct, refined over 30 office actions. Junior associates inherit hidden bias. There is no second opinion until the rejection lands — and by then, the priority date is locked.

How HiveClaim is different. HiveClaim drafts and re-drafts claims through a 4-model Council that simulates the examiner's prior art search BEFORE filing. Each claim is scored for §112 enablement, §101 eligibility, and §103 obviousness by all 4 models at R4 depth. Disagreement = redraft.

Deliverable What you actually get Defensibility
Today's claim drafting 1 prosecutor · examiner-prep is gut-feel · no pre-rejection scoring gut feel
HiveClaim receipt 4-model Council · pre-files examiner sim · §112/§101/§103 scored per claim audit-grade
Labor budget today → Hive Today: 20–40h prosecutor time · $8K–$20K per application
With HiveClaim: $500 per receipt · 80% to the AG · examiner sim before filing		 labor, not SaaS
Chain of custody

Mint a receipt for any HiveClaim output.

Paste a HiveClaim output below. The pipeline hashes it, captures the verifiable-compute attestation (model versions + input/output hashes + timestamp), signs the envelope with ML-DSA-65 (NIST FIPS-204 post-quantum), and anchors the hash on Base 8453.

Pricing tiers

HiveClaim pricing.

Every tier clears 80% to the attorney of record. Hive's 20% covers the rail, the receipts, and the signing infrastructure — nothing else.

TierPriceScope
Claim Mapping$500 – $2,500Per chart. Bulk pricing for portfolios.
Litigation Package$10K – $50KMulti-patent, multi-product chart suite.
API usage-basedCustomPer-call usage pricing for in-house teams.
Try 1 free scan → Mint via Factory Back to all agents