Doctrine · SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA

We exceed SOC 2,
ISO 27001, and HIPAA,
by 100× to 60,833×.

We have huge respect for the AICPA, ISO/IEC, and HHS teams who built four decades of careful rules into those tests. The Hive stack does not skip them. It beats them, and as a side effect of every transaction, it also gives you evidence that is stronger and more checkable than any sample-based audit can produce.


THE DOCTRINE

Why we did not certify: in our own words.

We did not go through formal SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification, and we want to be clear about why. We have huge respect for the work the AICPA, ISO/IEC, and HHS teams have put in over four decades to make those tests strict and careful.

The Hive stack does not skip those tests. It beats those tests, and as a side effect of every transaction, it produces evidence that is stronger than any sample-based audit can produce, by a margin you can measure. Here is how.

There are two reasons, and neither one is a shortcut. One: certification was built for a world Hive does not live in. SOC 2 assumes controls run on systems where you cannot cryptographically watch the internal state end to end, so a human sampling files is the best a third party can do. Hive transactions are watched end to end already. Two: we are setting a new bar, not dodging the old one. Every CRE envelope maps to specific controls in SOC 2 (CC6.x, CC7.x, A1.x, PI1.x), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (Annex A), HIPAA (45 CFR §164), GDPR (Articles 5 to 35), and the EU AI Act (Articles 9 to 17, 50). That is 225 controls across 13 frameworks. We did that mapping once, out in the open, and we publish it.

The Math, Plainly Stated

A SOC 2 sample is 60 instances per year. A CRE is one per transaction.

A SOC 2 Type II report says controls worked well over a window of time, usually 6 to 12 months, based on a sample of evidence a CPA looked at. Under AICPA guidance, that sample is usually 25 to 60 instances per control per year. ISO 27001 surveillance audits sample at a similar rate. HIPAA OCR audits check a small slice of records on demand.

SOC 2 Type II annual sample
~60

Evidence instances per control per year. The auditor pulls from a set of records the CPA defines, applies AICPA sampling rules, and gives a 95% confidence opinion on whether the control worked.

CRE per-transaction coverage
3,650,000

Evidence instances per control per year, at 10,000 transactions a day. Every transaction gets a signed envelope. No sampling. No guessing. Either you have the receipt or you don't.

60,833×
More evidence per control, per year (10K transactions a day)
3,650,000 CRE instances divided by 60 SOC 2 sample instances equals 60,833. Your transaction volume sets the ceiling here, not how strict the audit is.

The four customer profiles

Profile Per-day events Per-year events Multiplier vs SOC 2 sample (60/yr)
High-volume API platform 10,000 3,650,000 60,833×
Mid-volume SaaS / fintech 1,000 365,000 6,083×
Hospital: PHI access events 250 91,250 1,520×
Low-volume regulated entity 100 36,500 608×

In any real deployment, the multiplier never falls below 100×. That's the floor. Your transaction volume sets the ceiling, not how strict the audit is.


What that buys

Inferential evidence becomes forensic evidence.

SOC 2 sample logic

Probably operating

A SOC 2 sample of 60 says the control was probably working in the 60 cases the auditor checked. Sampling math lets you guess beyond that, at a confidence level that depends on how big and how similar the full set of records is. A real auditor would give you 95% confidence, with a margin of error of a few percent.

CRE per-transaction logic

Operated, or did not, on this exact transaction

A CRE on every transaction says the control either worked or it did not, on this exact transaction, and here is the signed record from the moment it ran. There is no guessing. There is no confidence interval. There is the receipt, or there is no receipt.

you go from a good guess to hard proof.

SOC 2 in detail

The AICPA Trust Services Criteria, mapped to per-transaction receipts.

SOC 2 is a review done by a CPA firm under AICPA SSAE 18 rules. A Type II report covers a window of 6 to 12 months. Controls get checked against five categories: Security (the common criteria CC1 to CC9, always required), Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), and Privacy (P1 to P9). The auditor samples evidence from each control group and gives an opinion on whether it worked.

SOC 2 control area Sample-based attestation CRE per-transaction equivalent
CC6.1 Logical access: auditor pulls 25 to 60 access-control samples a year Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 dual signature on every API call, bound to tenant ID
CC6.6 Encryption in transit: sampled TLS setup evidence ML-KEM-768 / Classic-McEliece-6688128f hybrid KEM on every payload
CC7.2 Anomaly detection: sampled monitoring records and tickets MMR root commitment: any change breaks the inclusion proof
CC7.3 Incident response: sampled incident tickets and post-mortems Tombstone receipt for every revoked or rotated credential, MMR-witnessed
A1.2 Availability: sampled uptime reports and SLA tickets /v1/cre/health endpoint feed signed and committed to MMR
PI1.1 Processing integrity: sampled data-processing records 4-family hash cascade (SHA3-256 + BLAKE3 + KangarooTwelve + cSHAKE128)
C1.1 Confidentiality: sampled access logs and encryption settings Per-envelope confidentiality classification + epoch-bound key
P1 to P9 Privacy series: sampled DSAR responses and consent records PII-class envelope field + forward-secure key epoch (deletion-by-key)
Can a customer still get a SOC 2 letter from a CPA? Yes. We help their auditor with the CRE log and the published MMR root. The auditor's job becomes checking envelopes instead of sampling files.

ISO 27001:2022 in detail

Annex A: 93 controls, 4 themes, mapped to CRE.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 spells out an Information Security Management System, and an accredited body certifies it through a yearly surveillance audit. Annex A 2022 folded the old 114 controls down into 93 controls across 4 themes: Organizational (37), People (8), Physical (14), and Technological (34). The auditor samples how well selected controls are set up.

ISO Annex A control Surveillance audit cadence CRE machine-verifiable evidence
A.5.15 Access control: sampled once a year Ed25519 signature on every API call, tenant-bound
A.5.34 Privacy and protection of PII: sampled once a year PHI-class envelope field + per-record epoch label
A.6.7 Remote working: sampled policy plus interview Endpoint posture committed to envelope at session open
A.8.5 Secure authentication: sampled MFA setup ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204) co-signature on every auth event
A.8.10 Information deletion: sampled deletion runbooks Forward-secure key epoch (Bellare-Miner): deletion-by-key
A.8.16 Monitoring activities: sampled SIEM records MMR append-only log, root publishable any time
A.8.24 Use of cryptography: sampled key-management evidence 5-Assumption Stack (PentaPQ) + Triad-Bound Receipt all-of-3
A.8.28 Secure coding: sampled code-review tickets 4-family hash cascade integrity check on every artifact
Can a customer still get ISO 27001 cert from an accredited body? Yes. We help their auditor with the CRE log and the published MMR root.

HIPAA in detail

Privacy Rule, Security Rule, Breach Notification Rule.

HIPAA is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. It has the Privacy Rule (45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164), the Security Rule (Subpart C of Part 164, covering technical, physical, and administrative safeguards), and the Breach Notification Rule (Subpart D). HHS Office for Civil Rights enforces it. OCR audits check a sampled slice of records on demand. A typical hospital creates roughly 250 PHI access events a day per active service line.

Hive runs a HIPAA-focused product at /hipaa-hive/ that applies the CRE envelope directly to PHI access events. This section explains the framework. That page is where you use the product.

HIPAA Security Rule section Compliance evidence as practiced today CRE per-transaction equivalent
§164.312(a)(1) Access control: access logs sampled on OCR request Ed25519 signature, tenant ID, and role on every PHI access event
§164.312(a)(2)(iii) Automatic logoff: sampled setup screenshots Session epoch label expires; envelope refuses to reissue after that
§164.312(b) Audit controls: audit logs sampled on demand MMR append-only log, with a publishable bagged-peaks root
§164.312(c)(1) Integrity: sampled integrity-check runbooks 4-family hash cascade per envelope (SHA3-256 plus BLAKE3 plus K12 plus cSHAKE128)
§164.312(d) Person-or-entity auth: sampled auth setups Triad-Bound Receipt: Ed25519 plus ML-DSA-65 plus SLH-DSA-SHAKE-256f
§164.312(e)(1) Transmission security: sampled TLS setup ML-KEM-768 / Classic-McEliece-6688128f hybrid KEM (TBR-grade)
§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information system activity review: sampled reports Per-envelope inclusion proof checked against the published MMR root
§164.530(j) Documentation: six-year retention sampled by OCR Forward-secure key epoch tag per envelope, kept by class
1,520×
More evidence per HIPAA control (typical hospital, 250 PHI events a day)
91,250 CRE instances a year divided by 60 OCR sample instances equals 1,520. You get a receipt for every record, and OCR can check any envelope against the published MMR root.
OCR audit support? Yes. The CRE log, the MMR root, and per-record receipts. The covered entity hands the bundle to OCR, and OCR checks envelopes instead of re-sampling charts.

The Honest Disclosure

What is shipped, what is roadmap, what we do not hold.

We won't hide the parts that are still roadmap instead of shipped. Rows marked Not held stand out on purpose, because the whole point of this page is telling apart what we hope to do from what we've actually built. If a number changes, the table changes. We will never move a row from “Not held” to “Held” without the real letter or certificate behind it.

Capability Status today Path
Per-transaction CRE issuance + verification Shipped: /v1/cre/issue, /v1/cre/verify n/a
4-family hash cascade (SHA3-256 + BLAKE3 + KangarooTwelve + cSHAKE128) Shipped, all four channels native n/a
Append-only MMR with bagged-peaks root Shipped, file-backed Public timestamping anchor: Q3
Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 dual signature Shipped (FIPS 204 final standard) n/a
Triad-Bound Receipt (TBR): Ed25519 plus ML-DSA-65 plus SLH-DSA-SHAKE-256f all three, ML-KEM-768 / Classic-McEliece-6688128f hybrid KEM Shipped, /v1/cre/tbr/* (Build #41) n/a
Forward-secure key epoch annotation (Bellare-Miner) Shipped: daily rotation, label-only Full key-erasure ratchet: Q3
Side-channel measurement (TVLA, 5 classes claimed) 2 of 5 measured today (timing plus power-trace), 3 on roadmap Full ISO/IEC 17825 reporting: Q4
Cross-framework control mapping 225 controls, 13 frameworks, a checked count published per envelope Expanding to PCI DSS v4 plus FedRAMP Rev 5: Q3
Formal SOC 2 Type II letter from a CPA firm Not held: we did not go through formal channels On request, we will help a customer's auditor
Formal ISO 27001:2022 certificate from an accredited body Not held: we did not go through formal channels On request, we will support a customer's auditor
Independent third-party MMR-root publication Not yet Public timestamping anchor: Q3

FAQ

The questions buyers, auditors, and regulators ask.

Are you SOC 2 certified?

No, not through formal AICPA channels. We have the deepest admiration for the framers and we exceed those tests. Every Hive transaction issues a Compliance Receipt Envelope signed under Ed25519 and ML-DSA-65: machine-checkable evidence that gives 100× to 60,833× more coverage per control than a SOC 2 sample.

A customer who needs a paper SOC 2 letter can still get one from a CPA firm; we support their auditor with the CRE log and MMR root. The auditor's job becomes verifying envelopes rather than sampling files.

Are you ISO 27001 certified?

No, not through an accredited body. Same posture as SOC 2: deepest admiration for the ISO/IEC framers, and we exceed those tests with per-envelope machine-verifiable evidence mapped to Annex A 2022. A customer who needs a certificate can still get one; we support their auditor.

Are you HIPAA compliant?

We do not use the regulator-quoted phrase “HIPAA compliant” for ourselves because compliant is a determination made by the covered entity and (when audited) by OCR. The Hive HIPAA-Hive vertical applies the CRE envelope to PHI access events and produces per-record receipts mapped to the HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR §164.312). See /hipaa-hive/.

A typical hospital generating 250 PHI access events per day gets 1,520× more evidence than an OCR sample audit can review.

Can my auditor still issue a letter?

Yes. The auditor's job becomes verifying envelopes against the published MMR root rather than sampling files. The CRE log contains every transaction; the MMR root is publishable; per-envelope verification is yes-or-no. Auditor work is faster and the underlying evidence is stronger.

What is the MMR root and where do I see it?

MMR is the Append-Only Witness Merkle Mountain Range. Every CRE envelope is committed to it as it is issued. The bagged-peaks root is a single hash that proves the entire log existed at a given moment.

We expose it on /v1/cre/health and /v1/cre/mmr/root. Public timestamping anchor publication is on the Q3 roadmap and will be added to the disclosure table when it ships.

How do I export evidence for an audit?

Use /v1/cre/export with a date range and tenant ID. The endpoint returns a JSON Lines bundle of every CRE envelope in the range plus the MMR inclusion proofs and the period root. Hand the bundle and root to your auditor; they verify with /v1/cre/verify or any client that implements the CRE spec.

What if my regulator demands a formal certificate?

Get one. The CRE log makes that engagement faster and the underlying evidence is stronger than a sample-based pull. We support your auditor or accredited body by providing the CRE log, the MMR root, and the framework reduction map (225 controls, 13 frameworks). The certificate sits on top of forensic evidence rather than inferential evidence.

Can I run on-prem?

Yes. The CRE issuer and verifier are stateless given a key and an MMR file. On-prem deployments keep their MMR file local and publish only the period root. The 4-family cascade hash, Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 signatures, and Epoch Ladder forward-secure key rotation all run without a Hive network dependency.

What is a Compliance Receipt Envelope?

A CRE is a signed JSON record issued for every transaction. It contains the canonical hash of the transaction (4-family cascade), the Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 dual signature, the epoch label, the MMR position and inclusion proof, and the tenant + framework annotations. It is Per-Transaction Audit Evidence in a single self-contained envelope. Architecture details: /cre/.

What is the Triad-Bound Receipt?

Triad-Bound Receipt (TBR) is the all-of-three signature mode shipped in Build #41: Ed25519 (classical) plus ML-DSA-65 (FIPS 204 lattice) plus SLH-DSA-SHAKE-256f (FIPS 205 hash-based), with payload confidentiality under a ML-KEM-768 / Classic-McEliece-6688128f hybrid KEM. Three independent hardness families must all break to forge a TBR. Endpoints: /v1/cre/tbr/issue, /v1/cre/tbr/verify. See /cre/#triad.

What about GDPR, EU AI Act, PCI DSS, FedRAMP?

Every CRE envelope maps to specific controls in 13 frameworks: SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, HIPAA, GDPR (Articles 5 to 35), EU AI Act (Articles 9 to 17, 50), CCPA, NIST CSF, NIST SP 800-53, NIST SP 800-171, FFIEC, NYDFS Part 500, ISO 42001, and SOX. PCI DSS v4 and FedRAMP Rev 5 expansion is on the Q3 roadmap.

How is this different from continuous compliance dashboards?

Dashboards show you control state over time and are an excellent monitoring layer. On their own, they are not audit evidence. An auditor still has to pull raw records and sample them. The CRE envelope is the record, signed the moment the control ran, and the MMR root proves that record existed and wasn't changed. Dashboards read from CRE. CRE is the source.


Next

Verify a real envelope. Read the architecture. Talk to us.

The doctrine is on this page. The receipt is on /cre/. The Triad-Bound Receipt is at /cre/#triad. If you have an auditor question we did not answer, write to us directly.


THE HIVE FAMILY

Exceeds is one surface. Here’s the family it belongs to.

Every Hive surface signs its own evidence with the same primitives: SHA3-256 canonical hashing, Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65 dual signatures, and a published Merkle Mountain Range root. The receipt is the audit evidence. This same envelope works everywhere: every transaction, every framework, every surface.